And it’s not just citizens who fall foul of this law – Apple does too … The ruling would also effectively outlaw Time Machine (as it copies music files), and the current behaviour of both iTunes Match and Apple Music, each of which copies music to a cloud server. This means that iTunes’ popular ripping feature, which Apple actively promotes during the software’s installation, is illegal. The IPO specifically notes that copying a CD to an MP3 player is not permitted. “It is now unlawful to make private copies of copyright works you own, without permission from the copyright holder – this includes format shifting from one medium to another,” a spokesperson informed us. The UK’s High Court recently overturned legislation permitting citizens to duplicate copyrighted material for their own private use, and TorrentFreak confirmed with the UK Intellectual Property Office that the ruling really is as dumb as it sounds. It appears it’s not just governments who shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near technology – it’s also courts. Need extra cash to upgrade? Sell your Time Capsule to Gazelle. We would recommend the $199 AirPort Extreme instead, as it has all of the router goodness and none of the hard drive headaches. However, Time Capsule hard drives are prone to failure over time due to frequent network access, and are generally not fast enough to be used for anything beyond backup purposes. Almost any wireless issue you might experience with a less expensive router disappears with an AirPort device, particularly when you set up a dual-band network. In our experience, AirPort Time Capsules are great routers and eventually problematic storage solutions. On back, AirPort Time Capsule has the same ports as AirPort Extreme: three inbound Ethernet ports, plus one for communication with a broadband modem, and one full-sized USB port that can be used with either a printer or a second hard drive. The height accommodates all of the large antennas required for 802.11ac wireless support, as well as enough space to hold the hard drive. Introduced in June 2013, the current AirPort Time Capsule looks identical to the AirPort Extreme: all white, glossy plastic that resembles a milk carton in size and shape, akin to a 6.6″-tall version of the AirPort Express. Apple first released this product as Time Capsule in January 2008 with lower hard drive capacities, 802.11n support, and a much larger footprint that resembled the Mac mini. up close remember to a decent AC wireless router it is not bad.The most elaborate option in Apple’s AirPort family of wireless routers is AirPort Time Capsule, a hard drive-equipped version of the AirPort Extreme that includes 2TB or 3TB of storage for backup purposes, selling for $299 or $399 respectively. wired ethernet too although with AC wireless. although the investment is a lot greater the end result is a lot better. The Time Capsule was primarily designed for Time Machine. If your networking goal requires a NAS, then use a dedicated NAS device. Let me therefore affirm Teserrax's point. (write is a lot slower which is again some other issue). that the synology is faster over wireless than the TC over gigabit ethernet. that should be the other way around.īut it is proof of concept. The test is to hard disk in the synology. so take it that with a bit of spruiking I can get the numbers up a bit. but my TC has never been hugely reliable. Wireless AC can easily transfer those kinds of numbers. It is the processor speed of the TC and its internal limitations. Tesserax numbers show that TC is NOT limited by ethernet speed. You can assume the numbers you get are going to be close to ethernet. so you have a full 1300Mbps link (or very close to it). well, it may show some improvement, but the biggest "bang for your buck" would be to change the connection between devices to a wired one. In my test the connection is wired.Īs far as replacing your 4th gen Time Capsule with a newer 802.11ac model. You are using a wireless connection between your Mac and your Time Capsule.You are using a 4th generation 802.11n Time Capsule vs.your results are significantly lower than mine. Your "Write" speed was stated as: 10 MBps. You stated that the speed was 17 MBps from the Time Capsule to the Mac. If the connection would have been wireless, the results would be lower. Read: 356 Mbps (or 44.5 MBps), where Mbps = Mega bits per second and MBps = Mega Bytes per second.įor a USB drive attached to the Time Capsule's USB port, the results were:Īll of these tests were done with a wired connection between a 2014 Mac mini and an 802.11ac Time Capsule as per the tip.The results for my 802.11ac Time Capsule were:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |